Wings of Dread (2026)

[Mr. Peaky Blinder]

Sorry, this is all I have for now:

Discovery 0:40 and prolonged bonus shots of victim from 2:10

【男人在飞机上遭遇劫机，不料下一秒居然在自己包里翻出炸弹。 #好剧推荐-哔哩哔哩】 https://b23.tv/PR3CwtB

Anyone know the title ... I'm still searching.

Update! The title is 'Wings of Dread' (2026)

[ilyacc59579]

Great find!!! I love it very much.
I always like the concept of only 1 victims among the taken down girls got stripped. Somehow it makes the scene hotter for me.

[rufusluciusivan]

I concur, that is a great find. And I agree that the detail of the fully-clothed stewardesses lying alongside the one who was stripped adds to the quality of the scene. It's comforting to know new scenes keep popping up. The shot of the three trussed up flight attendants is a blink-and-you-miss-it, but such a gem - great shot composition, with one girl lying on the legs of the other. Plus, the stripped woman is on the forefront! (I'm a bit confused as to why they showed her bleeding, since it's later revealed she was only unconscious - usually, blood from the neck indicates a lethal scene. I guess they wanted to make the scene more realistic.) The build-up of the discovery is also great, with the guy first only seeing the feet through the curtains, then the legs with the rest of the women hidden by the cart. And I like the fact they linger on the woman afterwards to ask her what happened - these bit characters are usually forgotten as soon as their role to provide a disguise is fulfilled. Reminds me of the scene in Rosario Tijeras, in which a nurse is mugged for disguise, and then later a full scene is dedicated to show her in recovery and answering the questions of police officers to tell them what happened.

The background music and editing is making me wonder if this is an edit of the movie's footage.

[Mr. Peaky Blinder]

I loved the black toe nail polish and the fact her tights had been removed too. The female criminal simply chose the flight attendant closest in size, very cold. Good stashing too. Not perfect stashing, but she tried and almost got away with it.

[Stormtrooper1990]

Am I the only one wondering why the hijacker chose to cut the throat of the stewardess, making a piss poor job of it in the process and risk getting blood on the disguise?

I mean why try to kill her to get the uniform but change your mind last minute? She's either a ruthless hijacker or she's not, you can't have it both ways.

From an infiltration POV, it's not good practice.

Is it a good disguise scene? Yes, but the lack of consistency on the part of the hijacker ( or rather how she's portrayed) leaves me frustrated.

[rufusluciusivan]

It is an odd choice indeed. This doesn't look like the kind of injury that could realistically happen during a struggle. (Had the blood been on the woman's head as if she had been hit to be knocked out for instance, it would've felt logical.) My best bet is that the hijacker purposefully injured the woman at some point to frighten her and the two other flight attendants into submission.

To be honest, the rest of the scene is good enough that I'll give them a pass for this inconsistency. Realistic underwear, no dumb redressing of the woman, a clear shot of the aftermath, good shot composition? Sign me in!

[Stormtrooper1990]

It is an odd choice indeed. This doesn't look like the kind of injury that could realistically happen during a struggle. (Had the blood been on the woman's head as if she had been hit to be knocked out for instance, it would've felt logical.) My best bet is that the hijacker purposefully injured the woman at some point to frighten her and the two other flight attendants into submission.

To be honest, the rest of the scene is good enough that I'll give them a pass for this inconsistency. Realistic underwear, no dumb redressing of the woman, a clear shot of the aftermath, good shot composition? Sign me in!

I don't know, rufus. If there are three of them and one of the hijacker the three women wouldn't give up so meekly they would have a go. Especially if she doesn't have a gun to force compliance. Plus, I find it hard to believe the hijacker incapacitates 4 crew one of them a man, without causing some sort of ruckus and on her own. She had to have had backup.

Maybe it's because at heart, I'm a perfectionist and crave details and consistency.

I will agree that the unfortunate stewardess looks sexy in that white camisole, (which always does a lot for me) and panties . Plus, you get the all important aftermath shots which are all too rare in most mainstream scenes. So yeah, I accept that on those merits.

[rufusluciusivan]

It is an odd choice indeed. This doesn't look like the kind of injury that could realistically happen during a struggle. (Had the blood been on the woman's head as if she had been hit to be knocked out for instance, it would've felt logical.) My best bet is that the hijacker purposefully injured the woman at some point to frighten her and the two other flight attendants into submission.

To be honest, the rest of the scene is good enough that I'll give them a pass for this inconsistency. Realistic underwear, no dumb redressing of the woman, a clear shot of the aftermath, good shot composition? Sign me in!

I don't know, rufus. If there are three of them and one of the hijacker the three women wouldn't give up so meekly they would have a go. Especially if she doesn't have a gun to force compliance. Plus, I find it hard to believe the hijacker incapacitates 4 crew one of them a man, without causing some sort of ruckus and on her own. She had to have had backup.

Maybe it's because at heart, I'm a perfectionist and crave details and consistency.

I will agree that the unfortunate stewardess looks sexy in that white camisole, (which always does a lot for me) and panties . Plus, you get the all important aftermath shots which are all too rare in most mainstream scenes. So yeah, I accept that on those merits.

Mainstream scenes are often imperfect - there will almost always be one at least one detail that's lackluster. Either due to censorship (I mean, how many victims were covered by a tarp just for this reason? ) or lack of consistency. They're being done by people who don't spend part of their free time on a forum dedicated to the tropes related to uniform stealing, and it shows. But in a way their imperfection is part of their charm. It highlights the things they do right!

[Stormtrooper1990]

It is an odd choice indeed. This doesn't look like the kind of injury that could realistically happen during a struggle. (Had the blood been on the woman's head as if she had been hit to be knocked out for instance, it would've felt logical.) My best bet is that the hijacker purposefully injured the woman at some point to frighten her and the two other flight attendants into submission.

To be honest, the rest of the scene is good enough that I'll give them a pass for this inconsistency. Realistic underwear, no dumb redressing of the woman, a clear shot of the aftermath, good shot composition? Sign me in!

I don't know, rufus. If there are three of them and one of the hijacker the three women wouldn't give up so meekly they would have a go. Especially if she doesn't have a gun to force compliance. Plus, I find it hard to believe the hijacker incapacitates 4 crew one of them a man, without causing some sort of ruckus and on her own. She had to have had backup.

Maybe it's because at heart, I'm a perfectionist and crave details and consistency.

I will agree that the unfortunate stewardess looks sexy in that white camisole, (which always does a lot for me) and panties . Plus, you get the all important aftermath shots which are all too rare in most mainstream scenes. So yeah, I accept that on those merits.

Mainstream scenes are often imperfect - there will almost always be one at least one detail that's lackluster. Either due to censorship (I mean, how many victims were covered by a tarp just for this reason? ) or lack of consistency. They're being done by people who don't spend part of their free time on a forum dedicated to the tropes related to uniform stealing, and it shows. But in a way their imperfection is part of their charm. It highlights the things they do right!

Tell me about it, censorship is one of the main reasons I tend to avoid scenes from China or India. But you can always rely on the Thai's or Maylay's to defy expectations..


Or unimaginative writers who don't think outside the box and are afraid on annoying the wrong people. Either way, I can see your point rufus. What's the old saying? Look past the coal dust to find the perfect diamond underneath. I think that statement epitomises this scene for me.

[rufusluciusivan]

I'd like to get my hands on the full movie to see if there is more context to the scene. The hijacker is said to have one accomplice. Maybe a scene shows how the flight attendants and guard were overpowered? Alas, it's too recent. No way to find a link yet. Gotta have to wait a little...

The white camisole and black briefs are what sell the scene to me. They're not revealing, they're quite plain, but they feel like the undergarments a real flight attendant would have put on in this situation. I often find the imagery of plain undergarments just as sexy, because they feel like we've stumbled across a real scene.

Coincidentally, I recall a scene in which one woman manages to overpower three officers while they're in their dormitory. Step 1: Grab one hostage. Step 2: Threaten the others into compliance with a gun. The episode then cuts to an other scene, and when it returns to the main character she's already in disguise with the officers bound and gagged to their beds. But one can assume she had one officer bind the other, then the hostage bind the second one, then she has the hostage strip of her uniform before binding her. That panning shot of the three officers bound and gagged to their bedposts has been living in my head rent free. Not much focus on the officers sadly, but Ibloved the imagery of them bound to the bedposts - two of them fully clothed, the third in her underclothes.

viewtopic.php?t=1849